Church responds differently to same-sex marriage laws | National Catholic Reporter

March 8th, 2010

When San Francisco passed an ordinance more than 13 years ago requiring agencies that contract with the city to provide spousal benefits to employees' domestic partners, then-Archbishop William J. Levada asked for a religious exemption, arguing that it imposed “an unconstitutional condition” on religiously affiliated organizations like Catholic Charities.

Cardinal Levada quoted:

“I am in favor of increasing benefits, especially health coverage, for anyone,” he wrote. “I would welcome the opportunity to work with city officials to find ways to overcome what I believe is a national shame, the fact that many Americans have no health coverage at all.”

Under what was then the new plan, “we would know no more or no less about the employee’s relationship” with the person covered by his or his health insurance “than we typically know about a designated life insurance beneficiary,” Levada wrote.

“What we have done is to prohibit local government from forcing our Catholic agencies to create internal policies that recognize domestic partnerships as a category equivalent to marriage,” he added. “I agree with moral theologians like William May who see no compromise of Catholic moral principle in this practice.”

via Church responds differently to same-sex marriage laws | National Catholic Reporter.

Boulder parish school bans child of lesbian parents – CathNewsUSA

March 8th, 2010

Protesters gathered Sunday morning outside Sacred Heart of Jesus Catholic Church in Boulder to signal their opposition to a decision to refuse enrolment to child whose parents are lesbians.

“I have a daughter that goes to school at Sacred Heart,” protester Colleen Scanlan Lyons said. “I've had 16 years of Catholic education, and this just reached the core of my being as completely wrong and against the teachings of Jesus.

“Inside the church, Fr Bill Breslin explained his decision and encouraged people to visit his blog to learn about why he decided bar the student.

On his blog, Breslin said, “This past week we implemented a policy that has been the most difficult decision of my life.”

Breslin also said he “chose to protect the faith over doing what would have looked like the loving thing to do.”

“Our school is a Catholic school, and our teaching on the sanctity of marriage is as clear as a bell,” the blog said.”

So, the decision I made was based on my conviction that we needed to rest on the side of backing our beliefs and our values. We need to fight for our Catholic values, because here in Boulder it seems no one else is.”

via Boulder parish school bans child of lesbian parents – CathNewsUSA.

Protected: Catholic League: For Religious and Civil Rights

February 26th, 2010

This post is password protected. To view it please enter your password below:


Beware of the Solists! (or) It’s Not Good to Be Alone

February 8th, 2010

Beware of the Solists! (or) It’s Not Good to Be Alone

Archdiocese of Washington

“There are a lot of “Solos” sung by our Protestant brethren: Sola Fide (saved by faith alone); Sola Scriptura (Scripture alone is the rule of faith); sola gratia(grace works alone). (See the Protestant Logo to the right). Generally one ought to be suspicious and careful of claims that things work alone. It is our usual experience that things work together in harmony with other things and are interrelated. Very seldom is anyone or anything alone.

“The problem of the “solos” emerges, it seems to me, in our minds where it is possible to separate things out. But the fact is, just because we can separate out something in our mind does not mean that we can separate it in reality. Consider a candle flame for a moment. In my mind I can separate the heat of the flame from the Light of the flame. But in reality I could never take a knife and put the heat over to one side and the light off to the other. In reality the heat and light are inseparable, so together as to be one.

“I would like to respectfully argue that it is the same withthings like faith and works, grace and transformation, Scripture and the Church. We can separate all these things out in our mind but in reality they are one. Attempts to separate them from what they belong to lead to grave distortions and to the thing in question no longer being what it is claimed to be. Rather it turns into an abstraction that exists only on a blackboard or in the mind of a (geeky) theologian.

“Let’s look at the three main “solos” of Protestant theology. …”

via Beware of the Solists! (or) It’s Not Good to Be Alone | Archdiocese of Washington.

Lech Walesa: World Has ‘Lost Hope’ of America’s Moral Leadership

February 8th, 2010

By Kathleen Gilbert

Image

CHICAGO, Illinois, February 5, 2010 (LifeSiteNews.com) – Lech Walesa, a Nobel Peace Prize Laureate and former president of Poland, has warned that the world has “lost that hope” with which it once turned to America as a moral leader.

Walesa was co-founder of SolidarnoϾ (Solidarity), the Soviet bloc's first independent trade union, which lead led the non-violent uprising that overthrew communist rule in Poland in the 1980s and delivered one of the major death-blows to the Iron Curtain.

The anti-communist icon gave his brief remarks on America during a Chicago rally Jan. 29 endorsing Adam Andrzejewski in the Republican primary for governor of Illinois.

“The United States is only one superpower. Today they lead the world. Nobody has doubts about it – militarily,” said Walesa via a translator. “They also lead economically, but they're getting weak.

“They don't lead morally and politically anymore. The world has no leadership,” he continued. “The United States was always the last resort and hope for all other nations.

via Lech Walesa: World Has ‘Lost Hope’ of America’s Moral Leadership.

Mary Ann Glendon

February 7th, 2010

ImageMary Ann Glendon (born October 7, 1938 Pittsfield, Massachusetts) J.D., LL.M., was the United States Ambassador to the Holy See and is the Learned Hand Professor of Law at Harvard Law School. She teaches and writes on bioethics, comparative constitutional law, property, and human rights in international law. She is a pro-life feminist. Quote:

“What is clearly ‘old-fashioned’ today is the old feminism of the 1970s — with its negative attitudes toward men, marriage and motherhood, and its rigid party line on abortion.”

Mary Ann Glendon. U.S. State Dep't photo

via Mary Ann Glendon – Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

The Spirit of Vatican II Is a Demon That Must Be Exorcised

February 4th, 2010

National Catholic Register Blogs: Bishop Nickless: The Spirit of Vatican II Is a Demon That Must Be Exorcised.

By Tim Drake

“…

Quoting from Pope Benedict XVI’s address to the Roman Curia in December 2005, Bishop Nickless draws attention to the two contrary hermeneutics that arose from the council — one which caused confusion (“a hermeneutic of discontinuity and rupture”), and the other which has borne fruit (“hermeneutic of reform”).

“The hermeneutic of discontinuity risks ending in a split between the pre-conciliar Church and the post-conciliar Church,” said Pope Benedict.

Bishop Nickless says that these two rival interpretations have weakened the Church’s identity and mission.

The consequence, says Bishop Nickless, has been a sort of dualism — “an either/or mentality and insistence in various areas of the Church’s life: either fidelity to doctrine or social justice work, either Latin or English, either personal conscience or the authority of the Church, either chant or contemporary music, either tradition or progress, either liturgy or popular piety, either conservative or liberal, either Mass or adoration, either the magisterium or theologians, either ecumenism or evangelization, either rubrics or personalization, either the Baltimore Catechism or ‘experience’ …”

Resp ad Dubium Ordination of Women

February 2nd, 2010

Below is the response by then Cardinal Ratzinger, prefect, Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, to a general dissent from Ordinatio Sacerdotalis. It was distributed under a cover letter here.

Resp ad Dubium Ordination.

Dubium: Whether the teaching that the Church has no authority whatsoever to confer priestly ordination on women, which is presented in the Apostolic Letter Ordinatio Sacerdotalis to be held definitively, is to be understood as belonging to the deposit of faith.

Responsum: In the affirmative.

This teaching requires definitive assent, since, founded on the written Word of God, and from the beginning constantly preserved and applied in the Tradition of the Church, it has been set forth infallibly by the ordinary and universal Magisterium (cf. Second Vatican Council, Dogmatic Constitution on the Church, Lumen Gentium 25, 2). Thus, in the present circumstances, the Roman Pontiff, exercising his proper office of confirming the brethren (cf. Lk 22:32), has handed on this same teaching by a formal declaration, explicitly stating what is to be held always, everywhere, and by all, as belonging to the deposit of the faith.

The Sovereign Pontiff John Paul II, at the Audience granted to the undersigned Cardinal Prefect, approved this Reply, adopted in the ordinary session of this Congregation, and ordered it to be published.

Rome, from the offices of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, on the Feast of the Apostles SS. Simon and Jude, October 28, 1995.

+ Joseph Card. Ratzinger, Prefect

+ Tarcisio Bertone, Archbishop Emeritus of Vercelli, Secretary

National Catholic Register Blogs: Does God Have Anything to Do With Us?

January 29th, 2010

The story below is about why God allows suffering with quotes from Augustine, Thomas and Chesterton. This is not an easy one for Catholics to answer, so we should be prepared by education.

National Catholic Register Blogs: Does God Have Anything to Do With Us?.

I’ve been a Christian since 1997 and Catholic convert for 2 years, I have never been plagued quite this way.

Some time ago an acquaintance told me that she believed in God and Jesus but did NOT believe that He has anything to do with us. She made her case based on the many unanswered prayers of believers vs. so-called “answered” prayers. “How do you explain that one child is raped and murdered and God does nothing even though the parents are praying…. and meanwhile, another child is spared because her parents were praying? Is one child more deserving and loved than another? Are the prayers of one set of parents more powerful than those of the other? She went on to say that this proves her theory that God set the whole world in motion and is just sitting back watching. She prefers to think this way than to think that God intervenes for some and not for others.

Now, I don’t consider myself an ignorant person and I’ve read my share of books and been through the gamut of searching, seeking, and faith shaking. My faith remains intact, but I wish I had an answer for her.

Ideas?

The only answer, at the end of the day, is Christ crucified. The one who served God best of all and was, above all men, most beloved of the Father is also the one who endured the greatest suffering and the most desolating abandonment, followed by the most awesome glorification.

Chesterton puts it best when he says that in this life, we are on the wrong side of the tapestry. The threads we see make sense, but they make sense somewhere else, not here. Trying to deduce why one person suffers and another is granted a miracle is not possible here because we don’t know the end of the story. That’s the lesson of Job. The neat answers don’t work and the nihlist ones don’t satisfy. But to the Christian, one person is granted a share in Christ’s suffering and another is given a share in his healing because God, who knows the whole story, is not absent and just sitting back watching, but present and making each person a sharer in the life of Christ as He sees best. The paradox here is profound and scary, because one of the people who shares in Christ’s life may well be the person who dies crying, “My God, my God, why have you forsaken me.” We may account him despised and rejected of men, yet he may well be the one to whom God says, “Well done, thou good and faithful” when he opens his eyes on the Other Side of the Tapestry to discover that he very sense of forsakenness was his share in the great redemptive act of Christ for the world.

Whatever the case, the one thing the Christian story definitively puts to death is the notion that God has nothing to do with us and stands aloof. If there is anything that the story of the Incarnation of God in the person of Christ Crucified tells us, it is that he is passionately involved with us, even when we can’t for the life of us see how in our little tiny present moment. When we step back and look at the big picture, with God himself spiked to a cross for us, we can see that, whatever else may be the case, he’s not aloof.

Ultimately, your question boils down to the only one of two arguments there has ever been against the existence of God: the problem of evil. Why does God allow bad things to happen. Ultimately, the answer to that will not be fully understandable in this life. But what we are told by St. Thomas is this:

As Augustine says (Enchiridion xi): “Since God is the highest good, He would not allow any evil to exist in His works, unless His omnipotence and goodness were such as to bring good even out of evil.” This is part of the infinite goodness of God, that He should allow evil to exist, and out of it produce good.

This is still mysterious, but it is no more mysterious than the Resurrection, in which God makes good on that promise first in his very own body. He allows the worst evil to be done, not to us, but to himself, and then brings the glory of the Resurrection out of it. His promise is that we shall experience the same. That’s a frightening promise, but again, whatever else it is, it’s not evidence for his aloofness. If anything, we’d like him to be more remote than that.

One book that you might find helpful is Peter Kreeft’s Making Sense out of Suffering.

Ultimately there’s no formulaic answer. Evil is a mystery, like love. But God assures us that love is stronger than death.

National Catholic Register Blogs: America, We Won t Go Away

January 23rd, 2010

via National Catholic Register Blogs: America, We Won t Go Away.

America, we won’t go away. Many people wish we would, and heaven knows we would rather be doing almost anything else. But we can’t go away, and we won’t.

I’m sure you’ve seen us. We may have made you angry, or sad, or we may have made you turn quickly away and find something else to look at.

You may have seen us two days before Christmas outside the Planned Parenthood building. The old man with the rosary, the college kids in sweats, the sad-looking woman clutching brochures and an “I Regret My Abortion” sign — that was us.

Maybe you felt offended that we stuck abortion in your face as you rushed out to do last-minute shopping, cheered by Christmas songs on the radio. Well, we felt offended that the “clinic” was open that day. We wanted to enjoy ourselves, too.

Or maybe you heard one of us at a town meeting you attended at the school or the senior center. Maybe it was a savvy young woman lawyer that you heard voice the pro-life argument. Or maybe the voice of the pro-life movement you heard was a halting, nervous voice that got a little too angry or whose words got a little too tangled. In either case, that was us, too.

We may have made you uncomfortable that day. We’re sorry for that. But we’ll be there again at the next town meeting, too. And the next. And the next.

We won’t go away, and we won’t stop talking about abortion. We won’t stop saying, again and again, that this is wrong, and it has to stop.

America, you know more about the unborn than you ever have before. Life magazine used to sell out when they put an unborn baby on the cover. Now, we’ve seen National Geographic’s “In the Womb.” We have sonogram photos at the front of our baby books and we saw our children for the first time in utero, through a video monitor.

America, you know more than ever that abortion hurts women. Those of us who have had an abortion know the guilt at what we’ve done and the anger at those who made it seem inevitable, who refused all help except the kind that kills. Those of us who have a friend who has had an abortion know it is a topic that we must never, ever discuss. It causes too much sadness, inflicts too much pain that can’t be relieved.

America, you know what abortion is, and we know you know. We won’t stand by and pretend with you that nothing is happening.

And we won’t go away, because we can’t make abortion go away from our own consciences. Abortion stings us. The sting is there when we see an empty playground and remember that 1 in 3 children in America dies by abortion. The sting is there when we read of successful surgery saving unborn children in the womb, and remember that babies don’t survive the most common surgery in the womb.

Is abortion necessary for women’s rights? Ask the teens impregnated by older men and brought to the “clinic” by them, too. Is it a matter of choice? Ask the women who wanted to have their babies but were badgered and pressured and tricked and even forced to kill instead.

But doesn’t abortion help women? Ask the ones who died on the operating table — or the ones who say they wish they died because the depression is too much to bear.

What would America be like without abortion? We can’t even imagine. In It’s a Wonderful Life, George Bailey gets a glimpse of what Bedford Falls would be like if he hadn’t been born, but then he returns to a world where that tragedy never happened.

We won’t get to return to the world we could have had.

Did we abort a statesman who would have changed the course of this country? Did we abort the musician who would have taken that art — and our emotions with it — to new heights? What cures, stories, jokes, athletic feats or technological innovations did we abort? What great actor is missing from our movies, what great teachers will never inspire our kids at school?

No, America, we won’t go away, no matter how much you want us to or how much we want to go.

We want to think we would have told the slave-sellers, “No way. Not here. I will use every legal means to stop you.” We like to think we wouldn’t have sat still in World War II Germany as the trains rumbled by. We wish we could have sat with Rosa Parks or prayed with Ruby Bridges on the way to school.

But we can’t do any of that. What we can do is remind you, America, in season and out of season, of the words you were founded on: “All men are endowed by their Creator with the right to life.”

So you’ll see us shivering in the cold again this January for the March for Life. And you’ll see us next January, and the January after that, and the January after that, until we wear you down at last and there’s no more reason to march.

And if we die before you change, America, we’ll be able to stand before God and say, “I defended the defenseless. I stood for the weak. My brothers and sisters couldn’t cry ‘Stop,’ so I cried it for them. And I refused to go away.”